Category Archives: Film, TV, and Theatre

Robert Donat in Goodbye, Mr. Chips (1939)

Some months ago here at OGOTS Tow­ers, in a piece on Walt Whitman’s O Cap­tain! My Cap­tain (see here), we looked at that won­der­ful role por­trayed by Robin Williams in Dead Poets Soci­ety: the uber-inspi­ra­tional teacher, John Keat­ing. Well, this week we’re look­ing at anoth­er stal­wart of the fic­tion­al school­room, one Charles Edward Chip­ping AKA “Mr Chips”.

Good­bye, Mr. Chips is a 1939 roman­tic dra­ma based on the 1934 novel­la of the same name by James Hilton. The film is about Mr Chip­ping (Robert Donat), a much-loved elder­ly school teacher at Brook­field pub­lic school, who looks back at his career and per­son­al life over the decades. We learn about his rise through the teach­ing ranks, his friend­ship with Ger­man teacher Max Stae­fel (Paul Hein­reid) and his trag­i­cal­ly short mar­riage to Kathy (Greer Gar­son), who dies in child­birth along with their baby. From there­on in, Chips’ life is devot­ed exclu­sive­ly to the school and he devel­ops a rap­port with gen­er­a­tions of pupils, even­tu­al­ly teach­ing the sons and grand­sons of many of his ear­li­er pupils.

Although he osten­si­bly retires in 1914, Chips is soon enjoined to return as inter­im head­mas­ter due to the short­age of teach­ers because of the Great War. Dur­ing a bomb­ing attack by a Ger­man Zep­pelin, Chips insists that the boys keep on trans­lat­ing their Latin, and to the great amuse­ment of his pupils, choos­es the sto­ry of Julius Cae­sar’s bat­tles against the Ger­man­ic tribes. Now there’s stiff upper lip!

As the war drags on though, every Sun­day in chapel Chips reads aloud into the school’s Roll of Hon­our the names of the many for­mer boys and teach­ers who have died in the war. It’s a poignant scene (that you can see below). Upon dis­cov­er­ing that Max Stae­fel has died fight­ing on the Ger­man side, he reads out his name, too. “Fun­ny read­ing his name out with the oth­ers, after all, he was an ene­my”, says one school­boy to anoth­er after­wards. “One of Chips’ ideas I sup­pose” his mate says, “he’s got lots of fun­ny ideas like that”.

Chips retires per­ma­nent­ly in 1918, but con­tin­ues liv­ing near­by. He is on his deathbed in 1933 when he over­hears his col­leagues talk­ing about him. He responds, “I thought I heard you say it was a pity – a pity I nev­er had any chil­dren. But you’re wrong. I have! Thou­sands of them, thou­sands of them.. and all.. boys”.

Robert Donat as Mr Chips

Hugo Weaving in Bodyline (1984)

A dra­ma about crick­et, at first sight, doesn’t smack too much of a great idea for tele­vi­sion. The des­per­ate pitch­ing of ideas by Alan Par­tridge to that pro­gram­ming com­mis­sion­er in I’m Alan Par­tridge springs to mind (“Mon­key Ten­nis”?). Well, how about a bril­liant, riv­et­ing TV dra­ma about crick­et that doesn’t even require you to be a crick­et fan to enjoy? If that sounds oxy­moron­ic, check out 1984’s Aus­tralian-made TV mini-series Body­line, telling the sto­ry of the 1932/33 Eng­lish Ash­es crick­et tour of Aus­tralia.

Stick with me.

First, the his­tor­i­cal set­ting: in 1932, the Eng­land crick­et team set sail to Aus­tralia to face an Aus­tralian team huge­ly bol­stered by one Don­ald Brad­man, who had come to Eng­land in the 1930 Ash­es and scored 974 runs with a bat­ting aver­age of 139.14. The Eng­land crick­et author­i­ties felt that some new tac­tics were need­ed to cur­tail Bradman’s extra­or­di­nary bat­ting abil­i­ty which threat­ened to be even more prodi­gious in the upcom­ing tour on his home turf.

Enter Dou­glas Jar­dine. Oxford Uni­ver­si­ty-edu­cat­ed, and from the upper ech­e­lons of British soci­ety, Jar­dine had been mould­ed to be Eng­land cap­tain from an ear­ly age. He had already toured Aus­tralia and had devel­oped an antipa­thy to the crowds there who had jeered him. And now he was lead tac­ti­cian on how to defuse Brad­man. With his fast bowlers Harold Lar­wood and Bill Voce, he devised “fast leg the­o­ry” bowl­ing – lat­er called “body­line” – which entailed deliv­er­ing the ball short and fast so that it bounced dan­ger­ous­ly towards the batsman’s body. When the bats­man defend­ed him­self with his bat a result­ing deflec­tion could be caught by one of sev­er­al field­ers stand­ing close by on the leg side.

The tac­tic turned out to be effec­tive: it seri­ous­ly dis­com­fit­ed the bats­men and Eng­land won by four Tests to one, but it cre­at­ed a furore that threat­ened to turn into a diplo­mat­ic inci­dent. The watch­ing crowds were out­raged and most com­men­ta­tors thought the tac­tics unsports­man­like, intim­i­dat­ing and down­right dan­ger­ous (who thought that it would be the Eng­lish to employ tac­tics that were “just not crick­et”?).

In the TV series, Dou­glas Jar­dine is played mes­mer­iz­ing­ly by a young Hugo Weav­ing (best known lat­er for his por­tray­als of Agent Smith in The Matrix and Elrond in The Lord of the Rings), who admirably cap­tures the arro­gance and cer­tain­ty of a born leader, and one who dogged­ly pur­sues his strat­e­gy against mount­ing crit­i­cism.

Let’s watch the self-assured Jar­dine dis­cussing Brad­man with his Sur­rey team­mate Per­cy Fend­er and oth­ers pri­or to the tour. He’s great to watch, and note also the love­ly cam­era work cir­cling him as he talks. One last word for the writer of the theme music for the series; the music is so emo­tion­al­ly mov­ing (see the sec­ond clip of the open­ing cred­its) that I thought at first they had bor­rowed a clas­si­cal piece from some­one like Pachel­bel but not so: cred­it to Aussie com­pos­er Chris Neal.

Hugo Weav­ing as Dou­glas Jar­dine

Claude Berri’s Jean de Florette (1986)

Jean de Flo­rette is a 1986 French com­e­dy-dra­ma film direct­ed by Claude Berri and based on a nov­el by one of France’s great­est 20th cen­tu­ry writ­ers, Mar­cel Pag­nol. The film takes place in rur­al Provence, where two local farm­ers (Yves Mon­tand and Daniel Auteuil) plot to trick a new­com­er (Gérard Depar­dieu) out of his new­ly inher­it­ed prop­er­ty. The film thus stars three of France’s most promi­nent actors, and this is a great place to see them all in action in one place.

The film was shot back to back with its sequel, Manon des Sources, over a peri­od of sev­en months in and around the Vau­cluse depart­ment of Provence, and whilst at the time it was the most expen­sive French film ever made, it was also a great com­mer­cial and crit­i­cal suc­cess, both domes­ti­cal­ly and inter­na­tion­al­ly, and was nom­i­nat­ed for eight César awards, and ten BAF­TAs. The suc­cess of the two films helped pro­mote Provence as a tourist des­ti­na­tion (a ten­den­cy that was cement­ed three years lat­er when Peter Mayle’s best-sell­ing mem­oir, A Year in Provence, was pub­lished ).

Any­way, I have my mate Jason’s wife Liz to thank for intro­duc­ing me to Jean de Flo­rette: whilst at their house sev­er­al years ago, she thrust the DVD of the film into my hands, say­ing “you’ll love this”. I took it home and duti­ful­ly watched it…and she was right! What was at first sight an obscure French film with a dull name and an odd plot became a huge­ly enjoy­able ride. The plot is indeed unusu­al, involv­ing jeal­ous designs on rur­al arable land, hare-brained plans and machi­na­tions around the block­ing up of a nat­ur­al spring. How­ev­er, it is a joy to watch: the rur­al vil­lage scenes are so glo­ri­ous­ly, authen­ti­cal­ly French, and the char­ac­ters con­jured up by these great actors, and a strong sup­port­ing cast, are tremen­dous.

This scene I have cho­sen is pret­ty rep­re­sen­ta­tive, I think: we have Depardieu’s irre­press­ibly opti­mistic Jean, pros­e­lytis­ing about his plans to breed rab­bits and grow mar­rows, Auteuil’s Ugolin try­ing at every turn to dis­suade and dispir­it him, and Montand’s Le Papet (Ugolin’s uncle), a wily owl pre­sid­ing over his and Ugolin’s schemes to dri­ve the new­com­er away and take the land for them­selves.

Daniel Auteuil, Yves Mon­tand, Gérard Depar­dieu

Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais’s Auf Wiedersehen, Pet (1983)

If you grew up in Britain in the sev­en­ties, you would be well-versed in the comedic TV out­put of writ­ers Dick Clement and Ian La Fre­nais: What­ev­er Hap­pened To The Like­ly Lads? (1974–1976) and Por­ridge (1974–1977) were a sta­ple of whichev­er night they were broad­cast. I loved those shows of course, but in 1983 the pair launched a com­e­dy-dra­ma so replete with char­ac­ter and bril­liant dia­logue that it stands out for me as a mas­ter­piece: Auf Wieder­se­hen, Pet.

Sev­en Eng­lish con­struc­tion work­ers leave an unem­ploy­ment-hit Eng­land to search for employ­ment over­seas and find them­selves liv­ing and work­ing togeth­er on a build­ing site in Düs­sel­dorf. The “mag­nif­i­cent sev­en” char­ac­ters were Den­nis (Tim Healy), Neville (Kevin Whate­ly), Oz (Jim­my Nail), Bar­ry (Tim­o­thy Spall), Moxy (Christo­pher Fair­bank), Bomber (Pat Roach) and Wayne (Gary Holton). I don’t know how the cast­ing process works, but they struck gold with this group of actors; they dis­played an on-screen chem­istry and authen­tic­i­ty that warmed the hearts of the view­ing pub­lic.

The tri­umvi­rate of Den­nis, Neville and Oz pro­vide the core of the group due to their Geordie ori­gins and shared trade as brick­ies, though the three couldn’t be more dif­fer­ent: whilst Den­nis pro­vides the com­mon sense and prag­mat­ic lead­er­ship, Neville is an inex­pe­ri­enced and home­sick fish out of water, and Oz…well, what can we say about Oz? No fil­ters or self-con­scious­ness, blunt and iras­ci­ble, bla­tant­ly xeno­pho­bic ten­den­cies, a ser­i­al abscon­der from his mis­sus, Oz is no angel (and a con­stant source of angst to the others)…but hilar­i­ous nonethe­less.

Bar­ry, an elec­tri­cian from the Black Coun­try, loves to expound bor­ing­ly but charm­ing­ly on the diverse range of top­ics he’s read about, which are usu­al­ly of no inter­est to the oth­ers because they don’t involve beer or women. Wayne the Cock­ney wom­an­is­er of the group, Moxy the slight­ly odd and usu­al­ly under-the-weath­er Scouser, and Bomber, the gen­tle Bris­to­lian giant who nonethe­less is well-capa­ble of look­ing after him­self, com­plete the group.

The key word for me about Auf Wieder­se­hen, Pet is “authen­tic” – the day-to-day ban­ter on site, in “bar­racks”, and out on the town, feels real and it’s a joy to watch. Here’s a mon­tage of typ­i­cal Auf Wieder­shen, Pet fare.

The Auf Wieder­se­hen, Pet “Mag­nif­i­cent Sev­en”

Cosgrove Hall’s Pied Piper of Hamelin (1981)

Along­side Aard­man Ani­ma­tions, those bril­liant stop-motion clay ani­ma­tors of Wal­lace and Gromit fame, anoth­er great favourite of the British pub­lic was Cos­grove Hall Films. Bri­an Cos­grove and Mark Hall first met as stu­dents at Manchester’s Col­lege of Art and Design, and then worked togeth­er in tele­vi­sion graph­ics at Grana­da Tele­vi­sion. They left Grana­da in 1969 to form their first pro­duc­tion com­pa­ny, Stop Frame Pro­duc­tions, mak­ing TV com­mer­cials, pub­lic infor­ma­tion films and also the open­ing cred­its and graph­ics for TV clas­sic Rain­bow in 1972.

The Rain­bow work led to Thames Tele­vi­sion cre­at­ing a sub­sidiary ani­ma­tion stu­dio in Chorl­ton-cum-Hardy, in Man­ches­ter, with Cos­grove and Hall as its lead ani­ma­tors. Cos­grove Hall Films was born. Its first series, Chorl­ton and the Wheel­ies, was pop­u­lar and ran from 1976 to 1979, but it was 1981’s Dan­ger Mouse that spawned their great­est suc­cess, run­ning through­out the rest of the eight­ies and being syn­di­cat­ed around the world. With famil­iar voiceovers from David Jason as Dan­ger Mouse and Ter­ry Scott as lov­able side­kick Pen­fold, it remains a firm favourite with every­one who lived through that decade.

How­ev­er, it is Cos­grove Hal­l’s mag­i­cal 1981 TV spe­cial, The Pied Piper of Hamelin, that I’m look­ing at today. I remem­ber stum­bling across it and being mes­merised by its bril­liant ani­ma­tion tech­niques. It takes the sto­ry of the Pied Piper as laid down in the words of the poem by Robert Brown­ing (whose lines are used ver­ba­tim) and bril­liant­ly illus­trates the strange tale of Hamelin’s plague of rats, the enig­mat­ic piper who offers to rid the town of them, and the dire con­se­quences when the town fails to pay him the agreed amount lat­er.

Here is a clip of the Pied Piper work­ing his mag­ic on the rats, with the narrator’s won­der­ful­ly rhyth­mic ren­der­ing of Browning’s poet­ry dri­ving the sto­ry along. Inci­den­tal­ly, whilst you could be for­giv­en for think­ing the Pied Piper sto­ry to have come from the imag­i­na­tion of the Grimm broth­ers (who did indeed tell the tale lat­er), the first ref­er­ence to the sto­ry was in a stained glass win­dow in Hamelin itself, and con­tem­po­rary accounts make ref­er­ence to some actu­al event that led to the town’s chil­dren dis­ap­pear­ing in the late 1200s. The stuff of leg­end!

Pied Piper of Hamelin

Robert Zemeckis’s Back To The Future (1985)

Remem­ber the times when a sum­mer block­buster could just be unashamed fun? In 1985 we got just that with the release of Robert Zemickis’s time-trav­el­ling mas­ter­piece, Back To The Future. It’s about fate, des­tiny, love, brav­ery, rock ‘n’ roll, the past, present, and future, and all the philo­soph­i­cal conun­drums the lat­ter entails. Heavy on action, com­e­dy and a myr­i­ad clas­sic mem­o­rable scenes, the film deliv­ers great sci-fi, adven­ture, romance, and sub­lime humour, all rolled into one. You all know it, unless you’re from anoth­er plan­et (and even then, hav­ing lived under a rock): Michael J Fox’s Mar­ty McFly is cat­a­pult­ed thir­ty years back to 1955, thanks to Christo­pher Lloyd’s Emmett “Doc” Brown’s time-trav­el­ling DeLore­an car retro­fit­ted with a flux capac­i­tor, and, well you know the rest…

The nov­el­ist L P Hart­ley (not to be con­fused with J R Hart­ley the ama­teur fly-fish­er­man) once said: “The past is a for­eign coun­try, they do things dif­fer­ent­ly there”. And indeed in Back To The Future, the numer­ous and fun­da­men­tal ways in which the 1950s dif­fered from the 1980s are explored to won­der­ful­ly com­ic and chaot­ic effect when Mar­ty embarks on his great adven­ture.

A big part of the fun of watch­ing Back to the Future is how much the first act of the movie informs the sec­ond. Prac­ti­cal­ly every line of dia­logue and char­ac­ter inter­ac­tion from the 1980s has its 1950s coun­ter­part, and usu­al­ly as the set-up for a smart joke. Zemick­is and his writ­ing part­ner Bob Gale also have fun in sub­vert­ing any rose-tint­ed view of the past we might have had. Their fifties may have looked like Hap­py Days but it’s far from being depict­ed as a gold­en age.

Marty’s moth­er Lor­raine tells her daugh­ter: “I think it’s ter­ri­ble! Girls chas­ing boys. When I was your age I nev­er chased a boy or called a boy or sat in a parked car with a boy.” Of course, as the movie pro­gress­es we come to realise that this is all fic­tion and the teenage (and boy-crazy) Lor­raine is clear­ly up for all those things and more: she is nei­ther Doris Day nor Joanie Cun­ning­ham. And as for the boys, well, Biff and his socio­path­ic friends are hard­ly bea­cons of respectabil­i­ty, are they? No won­der Lor­raine falls for Mar­ty and his before-his-time, un-tox­ic mas­culin­i­ty.

Any­way, here’s the trail­er that must have whet­ted many an appetite (despite the naff voiceover) when it came out and makes me want to watch the film again now!

Mar­ty McFly and Emmett “Doc” Brown

Sean Connery in You Only Live Twice (1967)

Who is your favourite James Bond? My for­ma­tive years coin­cid­ed with the Roger Moore era so I tend to regard him as my favourite Bond, with Live And Let Die my favourite Bond movie. How­ev­er, the defin­i­tive Bond, the one with the cor­rect mea­sure of rogu­ish charm and cool sophis­ti­ca­tion, rugged mas­culin­i­ty and sex appeal, but also gift­ed by the styl­is­tic ele­ments of the Six­ties (was there a cool­er car than the 1964 Aston Mar­tin DB5 dri­ven by Bond in Goldfin­ger?), has to be the recent­ly-deceased Sean Con­nery.

Con­nery made sev­en Bond movies begin­ning with 1962’s Dr No but today I’m look­ing at the fifth in the series, 1967’s You Only Live Twice, which par­tic­u­lar­ly thrilled me as a kid (despite con­nois­seurs gen­er­al­ly com­par­ing it less favourably to its pre­de­ces­sors). With screen­play by one Roald Dahl, it is the first James Bond film to dis­card most of Ian Flem­ing’s plot, using only a few char­ac­ters and loca­tions from the book as the back­ground for an entire­ly new sto­ry. In the film, Bond is dis­patched to Japan after Amer­i­can and Sovi­et crewed space­craft dis­ap­pear mys­te­ri­ous­ly in orbit, each nation blam­ing the oth­er. The Secret Ser­vice sus­pects a third par­ty, how­ev­er, and Bond trav­els secret­ly to a remote Japan­ese island to find the per­pe­tra­tors. He comes face-to-face with Blofeld (Don­ald Pleasence), the head of SPECTRE, which is work­ing for the gov­ern­ment of an unnamed Asian pow­er to pro­voke war between the super­pow­ers.

Direc­tor Lewis Gilbert, pro­duc­ers Cub­by Broc­coli and Har­ry Saltz­man, pro­duc­tion design­er Ken Adam, and direc­tor of pho­tog­ra­phy Fred­die Young spent three weeks in Japan search­ing for loca­tions, with SPEC­TRE’s extinct vol­cano head­quar­ters being a par­tic­u­lar­ly good find. The group was due to return to the UK on a BOAC Boe­ing 707 flight on 5th March 1966, but can­celled at the last minute after being told they had a chance to watch a nin­ja demon­stra­tion. That flight crashed 25 min­utes after take-off, killing all on board: such a lucky deci­sion for the par­ty and their fam­i­lies, and also for the entire future Bond fran­chise.

John Bar­ry pro­duced the score, and (as is typ­i­cal with John Bar­ry) the result was sen­sa­tion­al: the inci­den­tal theme music, and Nan­cy Sinatra’s stun­ning main theme song, knit the ele­ments togeth­er so well. Those ele­ments include all the usu­al tropes: car chas­es, fights, assas­si­na­tion attempts, love action and glam­orous Bond girls (notably the beau­ti­ful Kissy Suzu­ki, played by Mie Hama), gad­gets and gis­mos (includ­ing bul­let-fir­ing cig­a­rettes and a heav­i­ly-armed gyro­copter), and wit­ty one-lin­ers. How­ev­er, the movie is also hav­ing an obvi­ous love affair with Japan, and so as well as a whole lot of nin­ja action, we get some sump­tu­ous Japan­ese land­scapes and cer­e­monies.

The whole thing is of course majes­ti­cal­ly absurd but stonk­ing­ly good fun. Here is a nice mon­tage of clips from the movie along­side Nan­cy Sinatra’s win­ning theme song.

Bond, Tiger Tana­ka, and Kissy Suzu­ki

Bela Lugosi in Dracula (1931)

I recent­ly spot­ted that the 1931 film Drac­u­la was play­ing on the Hor­ror chan­nel, and duly record­ed it with one eye on a sea­son­al blog (this) and anoth­er eye on a suit­ably creepy fam­i­ly night-in with a clas­sic, jus­ti­fied by the prox­im­i­ty to Hal­loween. Frankly, I was scep­ti­cal about the lat­ter, giv­en that my mind’s eye visu­al­i­sa­tion of an ide­alised fam­i­ly event or shared expe­ri­ence doesn’t always pan out as imag­ined; I sus­pect­ed that the obvi­ous ancient­ness of the movie would turn off teenagers. Indeed, it did turn one of them off and she soon drift­ed vam­pir­i­cal­ly off to her bed­room, but the oth­er one, and her moth­er, were grat­i­fy­ing­ly drawn into this atmos­pher­ic and trope-laden clas­sic.

The cul­tur­al icon that is Count Drac­u­la had had its treat­ment ear­li­er than this movie: the Ger­man Expres­sion­ist film­mak­er F W Mur­nau had filmed Nos­fer­atu in 1922 (though with­out per­mis­sion and sub­ject to a copy­right infringe­ment claim brought about suc­cess­ful­ly by Bram Stoker’s wid­ow). The first autho­rised adap­ta­tion of Bram Stoker’s 1897 nov­el was the stage play writ­ten by Irish play­wright Hamil­ton Deane in 1924 and revised for Broad­way in 1927 by John L Balder­ston. The Broad­way pro­duc­tion cast Hun­gar­i­an actor Bela Lugosi in the lead role, which helped him (though not with­out oppo­si­tion from cer­tain quar­ters) secure the role in the film ver­sion four years lat­er.

Direct­ed by Tod Brown­ing, the film pre­miered at the Roxy The­atre in New York City on Feb­ru­ary 12, 1931. News­pa­pers report­ed that mem­bers of the audi­ences faint­ed in shock at the hor­ror on screen. This pub­lic­i­ty, shrewd­ly orches­trat­ed by the film stu­dio of course, ensured that peo­ple would flock to see the film, and indeed, with­in 48 hours of its open­ing, it had sold 50,000 tick­ets, and end­ed up being the biggest of Uni­ver­sal’s 1931 releas­es.

The mes­meris­ing per­for­mance of Bela Lugosi was of course a key ele­ment in the suc­cess of the movie. It is said that he was quite an odd and qui­et man; David Man­ners (who played Jonathan Hark­er) said: “He was mys­te­ri­ous and nev­er real­ly said any­thing to the oth­er mem­bers of the cast except good morn­ing when he arrived and good night when he left. He was polite, but always dis­tant”. How­ev­er, on screen he cer­tain­ly looked and act­ed the part to the point of cre­at­ing an endur­ing arche­type.

The atmos­phere of the movie is clev­er­ly craft­ed, and it has all the defin­ing fea­tures that you’d expect: the huge, cob­web-bedecked cas­tle, with an impos­si­bly large and rang­ing stair­case, an inor­di­nate num­ber of can­dles and hov­er­ing bats at the win­dow. Lugosi nails the Count’s stand-off­ish charm and of course the authen­tic east­ern Euro­pean accent, and there is a lin­ger­ing, per­va­sive sense of dan­ger.

Enjoy this clip, the excel­lent “mir­ror scene” in which, after a tense meet­ing between Drac­u­la, Van Hels­ing, Dr Seward, Jonathan Hark­er and his fiancée Mina, Van Hels­ing notices some­thing very unusu­al…

Bela Lugosi

Michael Curtiz’s Casablanca (1942)

In 1942, Hol­ly­wood churned out over 500 movies, most of which, nat­u­ral­ly enough, you will have nev­er heard of (unless you hap­pen to be a pro­fes­sor of Film Stud­ies spe­cial­is­ing in the for­ties, which is unlike­ly). When they were mak­ing Casablan­ca in that year, nobody was think­ing that this was going to be the movie that would become an endur­ing clas­sic still appear­ing near the top of “great­est ever movie” polls eighty years lat­er. What makes Casablan­ca so great?

You already know the syn­op­sis: it’s set in 1941 in Vichy-con­trolled Casablan­ca just before Pearl Har­bor and Amer­i­ca is stalling about enter­ing the war. The Ger­mans’ hold is tight­en­ing, and everyone’s fates are uncer­tain. Every­body is want­i­ng to get out before it’s too late. Against this back­drop, Amer­i­can ex-patri­ate Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bog­a­rt) runs a night­club and gam­bling den, Rick­’s Café Améri­cain. He also has pre­vi­ous as a fight­er in the Span­ish Civ­il War, so he’s no slouch, and he knows a lot of peo­ple. He has also come by two “let­ters of tran­sit”, valu­able and authen­tic doc­u­men­ta­tion that would allow the bear­ers to make their escape through Ger­man-occu­pied Europe.

Rick’s for­mer lover, from when they met in Paris dur­ing the fall of France, Isla Lund (Ingrid Bergman), walks into his club. Her hus­band Vic­tor Las­z­lo is a linch­pin in the Czech resis­tance; they need those doc­u­ments to escape to Amer­i­ca and con­tin­ue his work. When Isla con­fess­es that she still loves Rick (she’s no hussy though: when they’d met in Paris she had thought her hus­band dead) we come to the nub: Rick’s moral dilem­ma is to decide between his love for Isla and the good of the world. He makes the right choice, and at the end of the film (sure­ly this is no spoil­er) sends Isla and Las­z­lo off, with their papers, to fight the good fight.

Let’s talk cin­e­matog­ra­phy; it’s full-on film noir by Michael Cur­tiz. The use of light and shad­ow is used to dra­mat­ic effect: the moral­ly torn Rick is often seen half in light, half in shad­ow. Las­z­lo, the bright hope for the future, is almost always in full light. Isla’s flaw­less and pearles­cent skin is accom­pa­nied by eyes sparkling impos­si­bly by the use of tiny lights. The venet­ian blind is a handy way to cast prison bar-like shad­ows on the pro­tag­o­nists.

The nar­ra­tive is eco­nom­i­cal; there is no detail that doesn’t mat­ter to the plot, no scene that is wast­ed. Sure, there’s corn (more corn than Kansas and Iowa com­bined, said its screen­writer Julius Epstein) but it’s Hol­ly­wood, what do you expect? And sure­ly it’s no coin­ci­dence that so many clas­sic lines were thus spawned: “Here’s look­ing at you, kid”, “We’ll always have Paris”, “Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine”. I know that you already know that the line “Play it again, Sam” was nev­er actu­al­ly said, so we need­n’t men­tion that!

But let’s look at that clos­ing scene when Rick sucks up his per­son­al loss and deliv­ers that clas­sic part­ing speech to Isla, to the emo­tion­al orches­tral accom­pa­ni­ment of As Time Goes By. It is pret­ty mar­vel­lous stuff, isn’t it?

Bog­a­rt and Bergman

Peter O’Toole in Lawrence of Arabia (1962)

Years ago I read The Sev­en Pil­lars of Wis­dom, the remark­able account, by T E Lawrence, of his expe­ri­ences while serv­ing as a liai­son offi­cer with rebel forces dur­ing the Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Turks between 1916 and 1918. It’s a rol­lick­ing, rip-roar­ing tale, to say the least, replete with desert skir­mish­es, blow­ing up of trains and high-octane adven­ture but also much psy­cho­log­i­cal strug­gle, with Lawrence hav­ing to ame­lio­rate frac­tious trib­al enmi­ties in order to unite the Arabs against the com­mon ene­my. Then there is Lawrence’s own emo­tion­al tur­moil in bal­anc­ing his divid­ed alle­giance between the British Army, and its ulti­mate inter­ests, and his new-found com­rades with­in the desert tribes. The sto­ry was clear­ly ripe for an epic film to be made about it.

Suit­able, then, that cin­e­mat­ic heavy­weights Sam Spiegel and David Lean would be involved in the 1962 film ver­sion of these events,  Lawrence of Ara­bia, and an array of big-name, depend­able act­ing tal­ents: Peter O’Toole (in the title role, of course), Alec Guin­ness, Jack Hawkins, Antho­ny Quinn, Omar Sharif, Antho­ny Quayle, Claude Rains (along­side sev­er­al hun­dred extras). Actu­al­ly, Peter O’Toole hadn’t been the first choice for Lawrence: Albert Finney had been cast but was fired after two days for unknown rea­sons; Mar­lon Bran­do, too, had been offered the role; and both Antho­ny Perkins and Mont­gomery Clift were con­sid­ered. How­ev­er, O’Toole’s screen test and per­haps his resem­blance to the real-life Lawrence edged it for him. With his blond hair and pierc­ing eyes, he cer­tain­ly looked good on screen: Noël Cow­ard quipped: “if you’d been any pret­ti­er, the film would have been called Flo­rence of Ara­bia”.

The movie was helped tremen­dous­ly by the com­bi­na­tion of Super Panav­i­sion 70 cin­e­matog­ra­phy with the incred­i­ble back­drops afford­ed by the deserts of Jor­dan, along with a suit­ably majes­tic score by Mau­rice Jarre. It won sev­en Oscars, and is recog­nised as one of the great­est and most influ­en­tial films in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma. Let’s take a look at Lawrence enter­ing the desert for the first time…

Peter O’Toole as Lawrence