Category Archives: Film, TV, and Theatre

Dick Clement and Ian La Frenais’s Auf Wiedersehen, Pet (1983)

If you grew up in Britain in the sev­en­ties, you would be well-versed in the comedic TV out­put of writ­ers Dick Clement and Ian La Fre­nais: What­ev­er Hap­pened To The Like­ly Lads? (1974–1976) and Por­ridge (1974–1977) were a sta­ple of whichev­er night they were broad­cast. I loved those shows of course, but in 1983 the pair launched a com­e­dy-dra­ma so replete with char­ac­ter and bril­liant dia­logue that it stands out for me as a mas­ter­piece: Auf Wieder­se­hen, Pet.

Sev­en Eng­lish con­struc­tion work­ers leave an unem­ploy­ment-hit Eng­land to search for employ­ment over­seas and find them­selves liv­ing and work­ing togeth­er on a build­ing site in Düs­sel­dorf. The “mag­nif­i­cent sev­en” char­ac­ters were Den­nis (Tim Healy), Neville (Kevin Whate­ly), Oz (Jim­my Nail), Bar­ry (Tim­o­thy Spall), Moxy (Christo­pher Fair­bank), Bomber (Pat Roach) and Wayne (Gary Holton). I don’t know how the cast­ing process works, but they struck gold with this group of actors; they dis­played an on-screen chem­istry and authen­tic­i­ty that warmed the hearts of the view­ing pub­lic.

The tri­umvi­rate of Den­nis, Neville and Oz pro­vide the core of the group due to their Geordie ori­gins and shared trade as brick­ies, though the three couldn’t be more dif­fer­ent: whilst Den­nis pro­vides the com­mon sense and prag­mat­ic lead­er­ship, Neville is an inex­pe­ri­enced and home­sick fish out of water, and Oz…well, what can we say about Oz? No fil­ters or self-con­scious­ness, blunt and iras­ci­ble, bla­tant­ly xeno­pho­bic ten­den­cies, a ser­i­al abscon­der from his mis­sus, Oz is no angel (and a con­stant source of angst to the others)…but hilar­i­ous nonethe­less.

Bar­ry, an elec­tri­cian from the Black Coun­try, loves to expound bor­ing­ly but charm­ing­ly on the diverse range of top­ics he’s read about, which are usu­al­ly of no inter­est to the oth­ers because they don’t involve beer or women. Wayne the Cock­ney wom­an­is­er of the group, Moxy the slight­ly odd and usu­al­ly under-the-weath­er Scouser, and Bomber, the gen­tle Bris­to­lian giant who nonethe­less is well-capa­ble of look­ing after him­self, com­plete the group.

The key word for me about Auf Wieder­se­hen, Pet is “authen­tic” – the day-to-day ban­ter on site, in “bar­racks”, and out on the town, feels real and it’s a joy to watch. Here’s a mon­tage of typ­i­cal Auf Wieder­shen, Pet fare.

The Auf Wieder­se­hen, Pet “Mag­nif­i­cent Sev­en”

Cosgrove Hall’s Pied Piper of Hamelin (1981)

Along­side Aard­man Ani­ma­tions, those bril­liant stop-motion clay ani­ma­tors of Wal­lace and Gromit fame, anoth­er great favourite of the British pub­lic was Cos­grove Hall Films. Bri­an Cos­grove and Mark Hall first met as stu­dents at Manchester’s Col­lege of Art and Design, and then worked togeth­er in tele­vi­sion graph­ics at Grana­da Tele­vi­sion. They left Grana­da in 1969 to form their first pro­duc­tion com­pa­ny, Stop Frame Pro­duc­tions, mak­ing TV com­mer­cials, pub­lic infor­ma­tion films and also the open­ing cred­its and graph­ics for TV clas­sic Rain­bow in 1972.

The Rain­bow work led to Thames Tele­vi­sion cre­at­ing a sub­sidiary ani­ma­tion stu­dio in Chorl­ton-cum-Hardy, in Man­ches­ter, with Cos­grove and Hall as its lead ani­ma­tors. Cos­grove Hall Films was born. Its first series, Chorl­ton and the Wheel­ies, was pop­u­lar and ran from 1976 to 1979, but it was 1981’s Dan­ger Mouse that spawned their great­est suc­cess, run­ning through­out the rest of the eight­ies and being syn­di­cat­ed around the world. With famil­iar voiceovers from David Jason as Dan­ger Mouse and Ter­ry Scott as lov­able side­kick Pen­fold, it remains a firm favourite with every­one who lived through that decade.

How­ev­er, it is Cos­grove Hal­l’s mag­i­cal 1981 TV spe­cial, The Pied Piper of Hamelin, that I’m look­ing at today. I remem­ber stum­bling across it and being mes­merised by its bril­liant ani­ma­tion tech­niques. It takes the sto­ry of the Pied Piper as laid down in the words of the poem by Robert Brown­ing (whose lines are used ver­ba­tim) and bril­liant­ly illus­trates the strange tale of Hamelin’s plague of rats, the enig­mat­ic piper who offers to rid the town of them, and the dire con­se­quences when the town fails to pay him the agreed amount lat­er.

Here is a clip of the Pied Piper work­ing his mag­ic on the rats, with the narrator’s won­der­ful­ly rhyth­mic ren­der­ing of Browning’s poet­ry dri­ving the sto­ry along. Inci­den­tal­ly, whilst you could be for­giv­en for think­ing the Pied Piper sto­ry to have come from the imag­i­na­tion of the Grimm broth­ers (who did indeed tell the tale lat­er), the first ref­er­ence to the sto­ry was in a stained glass win­dow in Hamelin itself, and con­tem­po­rary accounts make ref­er­ence to some actu­al event that led to the town’s chil­dren dis­ap­pear­ing in the late 1200s. The stuff of leg­end!

Pied Piper of Hamelin

Robert Zemeckis’s Back To The Future (1985)

Remem­ber the times when a sum­mer block­buster could just be unashamed fun? In 1985 we got just that with the release of Robert Zemickis’s time-trav­el­ling mas­ter­piece, Back To The Future. It’s about fate, des­tiny, love, brav­ery, rock ‘n’ roll, the past, present, and future, and all the philo­soph­i­cal conun­drums the lat­ter entails. Heavy on action, com­e­dy and a myr­i­ad clas­sic mem­o­rable scenes, the film deliv­ers great sci-fi, adven­ture, romance, and sub­lime humour, all rolled into one. You all know it, unless you’re from anoth­er plan­et (and even then, hav­ing lived under a rock): Michael J Fox’s Mar­ty McFly is cat­a­pult­ed thir­ty years back to 1955, thanks to Christo­pher Lloyd’s Emmett “Doc” Brown’s time-trav­el­ling DeLore­an car retro­fit­ted with a flux capac­i­tor, and, well you know the rest…

The nov­el­ist L P Hart­ley (not to be con­fused with J R Hart­ley the ama­teur fly-fish­er­man) once said: “The past is a for­eign coun­try, they do things dif­fer­ent­ly there”. And indeed in Back To The Future, the numer­ous and fun­da­men­tal ways in which the 1950s dif­fered from the 1980s are explored to won­der­ful­ly com­ic and chaot­ic effect when Mar­ty embarks on his great adven­ture.

A big part of the fun of watch­ing Back to the Future is how much the first act of the movie informs the sec­ond. Prac­ti­cal­ly every line of dia­logue and char­ac­ter inter­ac­tion from the 1980s has its 1950s coun­ter­part, and usu­al­ly as the set-up for a smart joke. Zemick­is and his writ­ing part­ner Bob Gale also have fun in sub­vert­ing any rose-tint­ed view of the past we might have had. Their fifties may have looked like Hap­py Days but it’s far from being depict­ed as a gold­en age.

Marty’s moth­er Lor­raine tells her daugh­ter: “I think it’s ter­ri­ble! Girls chas­ing boys. When I was your age I nev­er chased a boy or called a boy or sat in a parked car with a boy.” Of course, as the movie pro­gress­es we come to realise that this is all fic­tion and the teenage (and boy-crazy) Lor­raine is clear­ly up for all those things and more: she is nei­ther Doris Day nor Joanie Cun­ning­ham. And as for the boys, well, Biff and his socio­path­ic friends are hard­ly bea­cons of respectabil­i­ty, are they? No won­der Lor­raine falls for Mar­ty and his before-his-time, un-tox­ic mas­culin­i­ty.

Any­way, here’s the trail­er that must have whet­ted many an appetite (despite the naff voiceover) when it came out and makes me want to watch the film again now!

Mar­ty McFly and Emmett “Doc” Brown

Sean Connery in You Only Live Twice (1967)

Who is your favourite James Bond? My for­ma­tive years coin­cid­ed with the Roger Moore era so I tend to regard him as my favourite Bond, with Live And Let Die my favourite Bond movie. How­ev­er, the defin­i­tive Bond, the one with the cor­rect mea­sure of rogu­ish charm and cool sophis­ti­ca­tion, rugged mas­culin­i­ty and sex appeal, but also gift­ed by the styl­is­tic ele­ments of the Six­ties (was there a cool­er car than the 1964 Aston Mar­tin DB5 dri­ven by Bond in Goldfin­ger?), has to be the recent­ly-deceased Sean Con­nery.

Con­nery made sev­en Bond movies begin­ning with 1962’s Dr No but today I’m look­ing at the fifth in the series, 1967’s You Only Live Twice, which par­tic­u­lar­ly thrilled me as a kid (despite con­nois­seurs gen­er­al­ly com­par­ing it less favourably to its pre­de­ces­sors). With screen­play by one Roald Dahl, it is the first James Bond film to dis­card most of Ian Flem­ing’s plot, using only a few char­ac­ters and loca­tions from the book as the back­ground for an entire­ly new sto­ry. In the film, Bond is dis­patched to Japan after Amer­i­can and Sovi­et crewed space­craft dis­ap­pear mys­te­ri­ous­ly in orbit, each nation blam­ing the oth­er. The Secret Ser­vice sus­pects a third par­ty, how­ev­er, and Bond trav­els secret­ly to a remote Japan­ese island to find the per­pe­tra­tors. He comes face-to-face with Blofeld (Don­ald Pleasence), the head of SPECTRE, which is work­ing for the gov­ern­ment of an unnamed Asian pow­er to pro­voke war between the super­pow­ers.

Direc­tor Lewis Gilbert, pro­duc­ers Cub­by Broc­coli and Har­ry Saltz­man, pro­duc­tion design­er Ken Adam, and direc­tor of pho­tog­ra­phy Fred­die Young spent three weeks in Japan search­ing for loca­tions, with SPEC­TRE’s extinct vol­cano head­quar­ters being a par­tic­u­lar­ly good find. The group was due to return to the UK on a BOAC Boe­ing 707 flight on 5th March 1966, but can­celled at the last minute after being told they had a chance to watch a nin­ja demon­stra­tion. That flight crashed 25 min­utes after take-off, killing all on board: such a lucky deci­sion for the par­ty and their fam­i­lies, and also for the entire future Bond fran­chise.

John Bar­ry pro­duced the score, and (as is typ­i­cal with John Bar­ry) the result was sen­sa­tion­al: the inci­den­tal theme music, and Nan­cy Sinatra’s stun­ning main theme song, knit the ele­ments togeth­er so well. Those ele­ments include all the usu­al tropes: car chas­es, fights, assas­si­na­tion attempts, love action and glam­orous Bond girls (notably the beau­ti­ful Kissy Suzu­ki, played by Mie Hama), gad­gets and gis­mos (includ­ing bul­let-fir­ing cig­a­rettes and a heav­i­ly-armed gyro­copter), and wit­ty one-lin­ers. How­ev­er, the movie is also hav­ing an obvi­ous love affair with Japan, and so as well as a whole lot of nin­ja action, we get some sump­tu­ous Japan­ese land­scapes and cer­e­monies.

The whole thing is of course majes­ti­cal­ly absurd but stonk­ing­ly good fun. Here is a nice mon­tage of clips from the movie along­side Nan­cy Sinatra’s win­ning theme song.

Bond, Tiger Tana­ka, and Kissy Suzu­ki

Bela Lugosi in Dracula (1931)

I recent­ly spot­ted that the 1931 film Drac­u­la was play­ing on the Hor­ror chan­nel, and duly record­ed it with one eye on a sea­son­al blog (this) and anoth­er eye on a suit­ably creepy fam­i­ly night-in with a clas­sic, jus­ti­fied by the prox­im­i­ty to Hal­loween. Frankly, I was scep­ti­cal about the lat­ter, giv­en that my mind’s eye visu­al­i­sa­tion of an ide­alised fam­i­ly event or shared expe­ri­ence doesn’t always pan out as imag­ined; I sus­pect­ed that the obvi­ous ancient­ness of the movie would turn off teenagers. Indeed, it did turn one of them off and she soon drift­ed vam­pir­i­cal­ly off to her bed­room, but the oth­er one, and her moth­er, were grat­i­fy­ing­ly drawn into this atmos­pher­ic and trope-laden clas­sic.

The cul­tur­al icon that is Count Drac­u­la had had its treat­ment ear­li­er than this movie: the Ger­man Expres­sion­ist film­mak­er F W Mur­nau had filmed Nos­fer­atu in 1922 (though with­out per­mis­sion and sub­ject to a copy­right infringe­ment claim brought about suc­cess­ful­ly by Bram Stoker’s wid­ow). The first autho­rised adap­ta­tion of Bram Stoker’s 1897 nov­el was the stage play writ­ten by Irish play­wright Hamil­ton Deane in 1924 and revised for Broad­way in 1927 by John L Balder­ston. The Broad­way pro­duc­tion cast Hun­gar­i­an actor Bela Lugosi in the lead role, which helped him (though not with­out oppo­si­tion from cer­tain quar­ters) secure the role in the film ver­sion four years lat­er.

Direct­ed by Tod Brown­ing, the film pre­miered at the Roxy The­atre in New York City on Feb­ru­ary 12, 1931. News­pa­pers report­ed that mem­bers of the audi­ences faint­ed in shock at the hor­ror on screen. This pub­lic­i­ty, shrewd­ly orches­trat­ed by the film stu­dio of course, ensured that peo­ple would flock to see the film, and indeed, with­in 48 hours of its open­ing, it had sold 50,000 tick­ets, and end­ed up being the biggest of Uni­ver­sal’s 1931 releas­es.

The mes­meris­ing per­for­mance of Bela Lugosi was of course a key ele­ment in the suc­cess of the movie. It is said that he was quite an odd and qui­et man; David Man­ners (who played Jonathan Hark­er) said: “He was mys­te­ri­ous and nev­er real­ly said any­thing to the oth­er mem­bers of the cast except good morn­ing when he arrived and good night when he left. He was polite, but always dis­tant”. How­ev­er, on screen he cer­tain­ly looked and act­ed the part to the point of cre­at­ing an endur­ing arche­type.

The atmos­phere of the movie is clev­er­ly craft­ed, and it has all the defin­ing fea­tures that you’d expect: the huge, cob­web-bedecked cas­tle, with an impos­si­bly large and rang­ing stair­case, an inor­di­nate num­ber of can­dles and hov­er­ing bats at the win­dow. Lugosi nails the Count’s stand-off­ish charm and of course the authen­tic east­ern Euro­pean accent, and there is a lin­ger­ing, per­va­sive sense of dan­ger.

Enjoy this clip, the excel­lent “mir­ror scene” in which, after a tense meet­ing between Drac­u­la, Van Hels­ing, Dr Seward, Jonathan Hark­er and his fiancée Mina, Van Hels­ing notices some­thing very unusu­al…

Bela Lugosi

Michael Curtiz’s Casablanca (1942)

In 1942, Hol­ly­wood churned out over 500 movies, most of which, nat­u­ral­ly enough, you will have nev­er heard of (unless you hap­pen to be a pro­fes­sor of Film Stud­ies spe­cial­is­ing in the for­ties, which is unlike­ly). When they were mak­ing Casablan­ca in that year, nobody was think­ing that this was going to be the movie that would become an endur­ing clas­sic still appear­ing near the top of “great­est ever movie” polls eighty years lat­er. What makes Casablan­ca so great?

You already know the syn­op­sis: it’s set in 1941 in Vichy-con­trolled Casablan­ca just before Pearl Har­bor and Amer­i­ca is stalling about enter­ing the war. The Ger­mans’ hold is tight­en­ing, and everyone’s fates are uncer­tain. Every­body is want­i­ng to get out before it’s too late. Against this back­drop, Amer­i­can ex-patri­ate Rick Blaine (Humphrey Bog­a­rt) runs a night­club and gam­bling den, Rick­’s Café Améri­cain. He also has pre­vi­ous as a fight­er in the Span­ish Civ­il War, so he’s no slouch, and he knows a lot of peo­ple. He has also come by two “let­ters of tran­sit”, valu­able and authen­tic doc­u­men­ta­tion that would allow the bear­ers to make their escape through Ger­man-occu­pied Europe.

Rick’s for­mer lover, from when they met in Paris dur­ing the fall of France, Isla Lund (Ingrid Bergman), walks into his club. Her hus­band Vic­tor Las­z­lo is a linch­pin in the Czech resis­tance; they need those doc­u­ments to escape to Amer­i­ca and con­tin­ue his work. When Isla con­fess­es that she still loves Rick (she’s no hussy though: when they’d met in Paris she had thought her hus­band dead) we come to the nub: Rick’s moral dilem­ma is to decide between his love for Isla and the good of the world. He makes the right choice, and at the end of the film (sure­ly this is no spoil­er) sends Isla and Las­z­lo off, with their papers, to fight the good fight.

Let’s talk cin­e­matog­ra­phy; it’s full-on film noir by Michael Cur­tiz. The use of light and shad­ow is used to dra­mat­ic effect: the moral­ly torn Rick is often seen half in light, half in shad­ow. Las­z­lo, the bright hope for the future, is almost always in full light. Isla’s flaw­less and pearles­cent skin is accom­pa­nied by eyes sparkling impos­si­bly by the use of tiny lights. The venet­ian blind is a handy way to cast prison bar-like shad­ows on the pro­tag­o­nists.

The nar­ra­tive is eco­nom­i­cal; there is no detail that doesn’t mat­ter to the plot, no scene that is wast­ed. Sure, there’s corn (more corn than Kansas and Iowa com­bined, said its screen­writer Julius Epstein) but it’s Hol­ly­wood, what do you expect? And sure­ly it’s no coin­ci­dence that so many clas­sic lines were thus spawned: “Here’s look­ing at you, kid”, “We’ll always have Paris”, “Of all the gin joints in all the towns in all the world, she walks into mine”. I know that you already know that the line “Play it again, Sam” was nev­er actu­al­ly said, so we need­n’t men­tion that!

But let’s look at that clos­ing scene when Rick sucks up his per­son­al loss and deliv­ers that clas­sic part­ing speech to Isla, to the emo­tion­al orches­tral accom­pa­ni­ment of As Time Goes By. It is pret­ty mar­vel­lous stuff, isn’t it?

Bog­a­rt and Bergman

Peter O’Toole in Lawrence of Arabia (1962)

Years ago I read The Sev­en Pil­lars of Wis­dom, the remark­able account, by T E Lawrence, of his expe­ri­ences while serv­ing as a liai­son offi­cer with rebel forces dur­ing the Arab Revolt against the Ottoman Turks between 1916 and 1918. It’s a rol­lick­ing, rip-roar­ing tale, to say the least, replete with desert skir­mish­es, blow­ing up of trains and high-octane adven­ture but also much psy­cho­log­i­cal strug­gle, with Lawrence hav­ing to ame­lio­rate frac­tious trib­al enmi­ties in order to unite the Arabs against the com­mon ene­my. Then there is Lawrence’s own emo­tion­al tur­moil in bal­anc­ing his divid­ed alle­giance between the British Army, and its ulti­mate inter­ests, and his new-found com­rades with­in the desert tribes. The sto­ry was clear­ly ripe for an epic film to be made about it.

Suit­able, then, that cin­e­mat­ic heavy­weights Sam Spiegel and David Lean would be involved in the 1962 film ver­sion of these events,  Lawrence of Ara­bia, and an array of big-name, depend­able act­ing tal­ents: Peter O’Toole (in the title role, of course), Alec Guin­ness, Jack Hawkins, Antho­ny Quinn, Omar Sharif, Antho­ny Quayle, Claude Rains (along­side sev­er­al hun­dred extras). Actu­al­ly, Peter O’Toole hadn’t been the first choice for Lawrence: Albert Finney had been cast but was fired after two days for unknown rea­sons; Mar­lon Bran­do, too, had been offered the role; and both Antho­ny Perkins and Mont­gomery Clift were con­sid­ered. How­ev­er, O’Toole’s screen test and per­haps his resem­blance to the real-life Lawrence edged it for him. With his blond hair and pierc­ing eyes, he cer­tain­ly looked good on screen: Noël Cow­ard quipped: “if you’d been any pret­ti­er, the film would have been called Flo­rence of Ara­bia”.

The movie was helped tremen­dous­ly by the com­bi­na­tion of Super Panav­i­sion 70 cin­e­matog­ra­phy with the incred­i­ble back­drops afford­ed by the deserts of Jor­dan, along with a suit­ably majes­tic score by Mau­rice Jarre. It won sev­en Oscars, and is recog­nised as one of the great­est and most influ­en­tial films in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma. Let’s take a look at Lawrence enter­ing the desert for the first time…

Peter O’Toole as Lawrence

Rudolph Valentino in The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse (1921)

The rise to star­dom of the orig­i­nal Hol­ly­wood “Latin lover”, Rudolph Valenti­no, is a remark­able one. I’m pret­ty sure nobody who knew him in his child­hood could have had the slight­est inkling of what lay in store for him: he was born in 1895 in Castel­lan­e­ta, at the top of the heel of Italy, to a cap­tain of cav­al­ry in the Ital­ian army and a French moth­er. Although even as a boy he was known for his excep­tion­al looks, he did poor­ly at school, squeezed a cer­tifi­cate out of agri­cul­tur­al col­lege in Genoa, and couldn’t find work. As with so many oth­ers, he depart­ed for the Unit­ed States, and was processed at Ellis Island in 1913, aged 18.

Rodol­fo, as he was then (real name: Rodol­fo Alfon­so Raf­fael­lo Pierre Fil­ib­er­to Gugliel­mi di Valenti­na d’An­tonguel­la), sought work bussing tables at var­i­ous New York restau­rants. He was fired sev­er­al times, but even­tu­al­ly one skill that he did have – danc­ing – secured him work as a “taxi dancer” (hired to dance with cus­tomers) at Maxim’s Restau­rant-Cabaret. He befriend­ed a Chilean heiress there and became entan­gled in some­thing of a scan­dal which moti­vat­ed him to leave town, join­ing a trav­el­ling musi­cal which took him to the West Coast.

It was on the West Coast that things start­ed hap­pen­ing for Rodol­fo; he was encour­aged to seek screen roles and his “exot­ic” looks led him to win bit parts in sev­er­al movies. His big break, though, came when he won a lead role in the 1921 silent movie, The Four Horse­men of the Apoc­a­lypse, which became a com­mer­cial and crit­i­cal suc­cess and cat­a­pult­ed him to star­dom. He was mar­ket­ed as the “Latin lover” with a new stage name, and the movies The Sheik, Blood and Sand, The Eagle, and The Son of the Sheik all fol­lowed, each one cement­ing Valentino’s rep­u­ta­tion and star qual­i­ty.

He soon became the arche­typ­al sex sym­bol of the silent movie era, along­side the fair-com­plex­ioned, all-Amer­i­can male leads Wal­lace Reid and Dou­glas Fair­banks Junior, as well as the oth­er con­tem­po­rary hearththrob mat­inée idol of for­eign extrac­tion, Tokyo-born Ses­sue Hayakawa (who decades lat­er would appear as Colonel Saito in The Bridge on the Riv­er Kwai). Valentino’s sta­tus as a cul­tur­al icon was sealed in 1926 by his ear­ly death from peri­toni­tis, aged just 31. Mass hys­te­ria ensued, and indeed the events of Valentino’s funer­al are a sto­ry in them­selves (100,000 lined the streets to pay their respects, but so much dis­or­der broke out that 100 mount­ed NYPD offi­cers were need­ed to restore order).

Here is a mon­tage of Valenti­no footage in var­i­ous pub­lic­i­ty shots and off-screen sce­nar­ios – if your only image of him is in cos­tume and make-up (per­haps as “the Sheik”), then you might find this quite com­pelling and worth view­ing to get an insight into the “real” Valenti­no and why the women swooned…feast your eyes!

Rudolph Valenti­no

The “Clinton Baptiste” Scene From Peter Kay’s Phoenix Nights (2001)

Obser­va­tion­al com­e­dy takes for its source the minu­ti­ae of every­day life that peo­ple recog­nise with­out nec­es­sar­i­ly hav­ing con­scious­ly acknowl­edged or dis­cussed out loud. Essen­tial­ly, it begins with “Have you ever noticed…?” and fol­lows up with some amus­ing obser­va­tion that hope­ful­ly strikes a chord with the audi­ence. A large part of stand-up com­e­dy is based on this premise, of course. When you bring in some well-observed char­ac­ters, them­selves honed from years of obser­va­tion of var­i­ous arche­types, and put them into a well-devised sit­u­a­tion com­e­dy, you can add a whole new lev­el of humour; Peter Kay is a past mas­ter at this.

It’s his obser­va­tions of life grow­ing up in Bolton that informs Peter Kay’s com­e­dy. In Phoenix Nights, we see his com­e­dy oeu­vre at its finest, hav­ing filled it with idio­syn­crat­ic but true-to-life char­ac­ters and sce­nar­ios gleaned from his expe­ri­ences of north­ern work­ing men’s clubs (for fair­ness, it should be men­tioned that it was­n’t sole­ly Kay’s baby: Dave Spikey and Neil Fitz­mau­rice were co-cre­ators and writ­ers). The Phoenix Club is a fic­tion­al work­ing men’s club, home to the usu­al vari­ety of club themes: cabaret enter­tain­ment, bin­go nights, karaoke, raf­fles, fundrais­ers, and themed nights, with a stage bedecked with a tin­sel­ly back-drop and — all mod cons! — a smoke machine.

The scene I’m high­light­ing is the one star­ring “psy­chic medi­um”, Clin­ton Bap­tiste, and it strikes, I think, a seam of com­e­dy gold. Replete with the motifs of the end-of-the-pier enter­tain­er – the camp­ness, the mul­let, the flam­boy­ant suit, the local accent at odds with the assumed grav­i­tas of a true mys­tic – actor Alex Rowe’s char­ac­ter is a gift, and he por­trays it bril­liant­ly. The con­ceit is that Bap­tiste is a rub­bish medi­um, with no redeem­ing qual­i­ties, and none of the empa­thy that you would expect from a tru­ly spir­i­tu­al per­son.

Not only is he clum­si­ly obvi­ous with his cold-read­ing tech­niques (“is there a John in the audi­ence?”), but he also man­ages to cause offence and upset by deliv­er­ing the bluntest of mes­sages from “beyond the grave”. To one lady: “You’ve not been well have you? And it is ter­mi­nal, isn’t it…?” (which is evi­dent­ly news to her!). And to a man sit­ting with his wife: “Is there some­thing you want­ed to tell her? Get off your chest maybe?”. “What is it?”, we hear the wife demand­ing, as Clin­ton walks away.

Inci­den­tal­ly, Alex Rowe has gone on to devel­op the Clin­ton Bap­tiste char­ac­ter, out­side of the Phoenix Nights episode – check out the hilar­i­ous Clin­ton Baptiste’s Para­nor­mal Pod­cast. But for now, let’s watch his orig­i­nal scene, and enjoy Clin­ton “get­ting a word”…

The Shower Scene in Alfred Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960)

In Novem­ber 1957, police in Plain­field, Wis­con­sin, inves­ti­gat­ing the dis­ap­pear­ance of store own­er Ber­nice Wor­den, arrest­ed one Edward Gein. Upon search­ing his house, they found Bernice’s decap­i­tat­ed body hang­ing upside down by her legs and “dressed out like a deer”. In addi­tion, they found a cat­a­logue of gris­ly tro­phies and keep­sakes made from human skin and bones. Gein con­fessed to mur­der­ing two women and, even more shock­ing­ly, exhum­ing up to nine corpses of recent­ly-buried mid­dle-aged women from local grave­yards. The Butch­er of Plain­field, as he became known, would pro­vide inspi­ra­tion for the future mak­ers of the Texas Chain­saw Mas­sacre, The Silence of the Lambs, and – thanks to the 1959 Robert Bloch nov­el of the same name – Alfred Hitchcock’s Psy­cho.

Besides mak­ing peo­ple for­ev­er wary of motel-room show­ers, Hitch­cock­’s Psy­cho con­tin­ues to have an incal­cu­la­ble influ­ence on pop­u­lar cul­ture. It was a clear mark­er in the his­to­ry of cin­e­ma, par­tic­u­lar­ly the psy­cho­log­i­cal thriller, of which Hitch­cock was a mas­ter. It may not have been the first “slash­er movie” (that cred­it has been giv­en to British movie Peep­ing Tom, released just three months pri­or to Psy­cho, or even 1932’s Thir­teen Women) but it was cer­tain­ly the most dra­mat­ic and impact­ful in the pub­lic con­scious­ness.

It is of course the sto­ry of Nor­man Bates (Antho­ny Perkins), the obses­sion­al, split-per­son­al­i­ty psy­chopath of the title, and Mar­i­on Crane (Janet Leigh), the sin­gle female find­ing her­self in very much the wrong place at the wrong time, name­ly Bates Motel. The noto­ri­ous show­er scene, in which Mar­i­on is mur­dered in a fren­zied knife attack, is the piv­otal scene and one of the most stud­ied mon­tages of film edit­ing ever made. It was shot over one week in Decem­ber 1959. The fin­ished scene runs for three min­utes, includes sev­en­ty sev­en dif­fer­ent cam­era angles, main­ly extreme close-ups and fifty cuts.

For Leigh’s blood, which swirled down the show­er drain, Hitch­cock used Bosco choco­late syrup. To cre­ate the sound effect of the knife stab­bing flesh, he sent prop man Bob Bone out to fetch a vari­ety of mel­ons. The direc­tor then closed his eyes as Bone took turns stab­bing water­mel­ons, casabas, can­taloupes and hon­ey­dews (he chose casa­ba). The sound­track of screech­ing string instru­ments was an orig­i­nal and high­ly effec­tive piece by com­pos­er Bernard Her­rmann.

Para­mount had con­sid­ered the movie a high­ly risky project, so Hitch­cock deferred his salary in exchange for 60 per­cent of the net prof­it. The film cost just $800,000 to make, grossed $40 mil­lion and Hitch­cock pock­et­ed some $15 million…so not a bad deci­sion!

Alfred Hitch­cock